[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Clarifying the use of the scale filter interlace option
michaelni at gmx.at
Tue Mar 27 19:50:06 CEST 2012
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:09:54PM +0100, Tim Nicholson wrote:
> On 27/03/12 07:47, Tim Nicholson wrote:
> > On 26/03/12 23:55, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 05:37:47PM +0100, Tim Nicholson wrote:
> >>> Based upon some recent queries on ffmpeg-user, and my own experience, a little
> >>> clarification of the documentation should help users in this area.
> >>> --
> >>> Tim
> >>> From a9c2a766e0f94105004ca467902519dfd123053f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >>> From: Tim Nicholson <Tim.Nicholson at bbc.co.uk>
> >>> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:22:16 +0100
> >>> Subject: [PATCH] Clarify the use of the interl=1|-1 option of the scale
> >>> filter.
> >>> It is not entirely clear that whilst for width and height only an
> >>> expression needs to be provided, for interlace the option must
> >>> also be given.
> >>> It is also unclear that the default is non interlaced aware scaling.
> >> patch LGTM but git am doesnt like it
> >> it seems line wraped
> > Bother, my mail client isn't doing what its told.
> > Is this any better?
> or preferably this without the typo in the commit message....
> Sorry, not having a good time at the moment:(
> filters.texi | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> cf7c0a3ddfe7d6a89d8d40748549eea554bb25d4 0001-Clarify-the-use-of-the-interl-1-1-option-of-the-scal.patch
> From 35a6c4b3a1206c9286211a6b5f4c66bfa73f5e80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tim Nicholson <Tim.Nicholson at bbc.co.uk>
> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:39:05 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Clarify the use of the interl=1|-1 option of the scale
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
The misfortune of the wise is better than the prosperity of the fool.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel