[FFmpeg-devel] Old roundup & our Trac
Reimar.Doeffinger at gmx.de
Mon May 21 22:07:18 CEST 2012
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:50:35PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 08:31:11AM -0400, compn wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 May 2012 21:39:42 +1000, Peter Ross wrote:
> > >On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 09:37:45PM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> > >> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 09:30:44PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> > >> > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 09:22:41PM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> > >> > > If we have additional comments on some issue we can import them into
> > >> > > trac and add a reference back.
> > >> > > What value do you see this bug-juggling adding?
> > >> >
> > >> > ...I don't think all the roundup issues are closed, and we can't comment
> > >> > them anymore. Maybe we can just re-open by hand the most important ones?
> > >>
> > >> Those are ancient issues, if nobody looked at them by now will anyone
> > >> ever?
> > >
> > >Ditto. Is a bug that nobody fixes, really a bug?
> > its an undocumented feature...
> OK so just to sum up the overall opinion, most people would be in favor to
> just mirror the old roundup to a roundup.ffmpeg.org and be done with it?
> If so, I'm afraid we will need to deal with the "privacy" issue of the
> roundup DB with Luca. I don't know who is in charge of our server ATM, but
> I think he/they will need to see with Luca by themselves (I don't think I
> can help much here).
Well, for the purposes I care about a static dump of the actual pages
for example would work well enough. I don't really think it is easier to
get though (in a sane way, not just a wget over all issues and
attachments or something like that, though it would work as an
"emergency" solution if you ignore that it's rather a lot of effort).
More information about the ffmpeg-devel