[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] swscale: fix To{Y, UV} extern prototypes.

Clément Bœsch ubitux at gmail.com
Mon Oct 1 01:04:39 CEST 2012

On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 03:42:37PM -0700, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Clément Bœsch <ubitux at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 03:11:10PM -0700, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> >> but why on earth would I care if this is the best I get in response
> >> for all my efforts?
> >
> > I think you misunderstand the statements made, and/or the ton. What are
> > you exactly angry about here?
> "that makes only sense when libav will continue to work on sws and
> there is something to merge ..."

OK, but as I explained, this was said because Libav expressed the will to
rewrite it from scratch, so it was uncertain more changes would come. It
was not about judging anything. And in the context, it was all about
following some Libav changes or not in FFmpeg, not about flaming/provoking
or anything.

> The suggestion is that A) we haven't done shit in the past few years,
> and B) that our only purpose should be to serve you your dogfood.

I'm sorry, but I think you're just overreacting and over-interpreting
things. At least in this particular case.

> Note that in the above, we=I and our=my, given that I'm the only
> person actually doing any real new non-maintenance work on sws in the
> past few years.

Your work was and is still appreciated, and I even remember Michael
expressing it clearly (if you insist I may look into an old thread).

Also note that Michael (anyone please correct me if I'm interpreting
things wrong) just got quite frustrated at the beginning of your sws
cleanup after you kind of ignored the review he was proposing (maybe in a
"harsh" way), even after you broke one or two things.

> Thus, the suggestion is misleading and insulting. Michael needs social skills.

That's your own opinion, relationships seem to go quite well these days
with us other ffmpeg developers AFAICT.

Now I'm sure Michael will be able to express himself better than anyone
else, I just wanted to give an external point of view.

Clément B.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20121001/77b14eb7/attachment.asc>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list