[FFmpeg-devel] Issue 3052

[Nicolas George]

L'octidi 28 messidor, an CCXXII, Michael Niedermayer a écrit :
> again, i suspect this is not updated by filters currently

You are right, the filters do not update them currently.

I believe changing that policy would not be a convenient way of solving that
issue: the duration information raises consistency problems: what happens if
next_frame->pts is not equal to cur_frame->pts + cur_frame->duration.

Also, that would be abusing a field, since pkt_duration is the duration of a
packet, not a frame.

I believe a better solution would be to send EOF pseudo-frames forward in
the filter chain instead of relying on the backward request_frame() calls to
return EOF: it would solve this particular issue (a pseudo-frame has a
timestamp) and other issues as well.

This is one of the main things I intend to look at during this summer.

Regards,

-- 
  Nicolas George
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20140717/ce625eb8/attachment.asc>