[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/18] avcodec: remove obsolete FF_API_FAST_MALLOC cruft
michaelni at gmx.at
Wed Oct 1 04:34:46 CEST 2014
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:59:39PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> On 15.09.2014 22:03, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:08:49PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> >>On 15/09/14 6:07 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>>On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:46:03PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> >>>>Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial at gmail.com>
> >>>about the patchset as a whole, not specifically this one
> >>>we should check if theres any software left around that still uses
> >>>the symbols before removing the code completely and if so consider
> >>>to reintroduce them in a 2.4.1 while removing whats unused
> >>Pushed the three you reviewed since either no code depended on them, or in the
> >>OpenCL case it's an API that nobody has ever been able to use anyway.
> >>I'm not exactly interested in looking around to see if any of this deprecated
> >>stuff is still used. And IMO reintroducing them in a point release is quite ugly.
> >>An exception could be FF_API_DRAWTEXT_OLD_TIMELINE since as Clément pointed in
> >>another email might be needed to remain compatible with libav.
> >probably you only have to wait, as i suspect andreas (in CC) will
> >test building all dependant packages in debian against 2.4
> You're right that I'm currently rebuilding those against 2.4, but I
> don't expect any problems there, since I already have rebuilt them
> against a git snapshot about two weeks ago and didn't notice
> anything problematic.
any news ? can these be applied ?
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
DNS cache poisoning attacks, popular search engine, Google internet authority
dont be evil, please
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel