[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] vp9: add hwaccel hooks

Ronald S. Bultje rsbultje at gmail.com
Fri Dec 4 14:52:34 CET 2015


Hi,

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.leppkes at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbultje at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.leppkes at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbultje at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.leppkes at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> +    if (s->pix_fmt == AV_PIX_FMT_YUV420P) {
> >> >>
> >> > +#if CONFIG_VP9_DXVA2_HWACCEL
> >> >> +        *fmtp++ = AV_PIX_FMT_DXVA2_VLD;
> >> >> +#endif
> >> >> +#if CONFIG_VP9_D3D11VA_HWACCEL
> >> >> +        *fmtp++ = AV_PIX_FMT_D3D11VA_VLD;
> >> >> +#endif
> >> >> +    }
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > So ... this suggests that hwaccels will ever only support 420, 8bpp.
> That
> >> > may currently be true, but is that likely to hold forever? What
> happens
> >> if
> >> > we just do this regardless of pixfmt and let the hwaccel figure out if
> >> the
> >> > hw supports 420 or something else?
> >> >
> >>
> >> At the very least the DXVA2 hwaccel spec is limited to profile 0, so
> >> maybe it should even check the profile on top of this.
> >> In general, there is some disagreement if other chroma formats should
> >> use other hwaccel pixfmts, as the calling code can otherwise get
> >> confused, as it may need special handling to handle other chroma
> >> formats. However, since no hwaccel supports anything else yet (except
> >> hevc, which can do 420 10-bit, but I didn't push that to ffmpeg yet),
> >> it was not a real problem yet.
> >
> >
> > I'm ok with deferring it until such hardware comes along I guess, so
> > consider the comment ignorable...
> >
>
> Any comments on the vp9 changes themself? :)
>
> Most of the changes are not very invasive, just some extra allocations
> and error handling, the default hwaccel hooks, and whatnot.
> I moved the reference frame check down as we discussed on IRC the
> other day, so that it can happen after the decoder has been switched
> into or out of HWAccel mode.


Yeah, it looked pretty straightforward. Sorry, I now realized I never said
it was OK. So: LGTM.

Ronald


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list