[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/mpegts: recognizes and export private streams

[Wolfgang Lorenz]

Am Thu, 11 Jun 2015 23:11:37 +0200
schrieb Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>:

> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:59:23PM +0200, Wolfgang Lorenz wrote:
> > Hi Micheal,
> > 
> > Am Wed, 10 Jun 2015 23:40:10 +0200
> > schrieb Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>:
> > 
> > > Based on patch by Wolfgang Lorenz <wl-chmw at gmx.de>
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>
> > > ---
> > >  libavformat/mpegts.c |    7 +++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/libavformat/mpegts.c b/libavformat/mpegts.c
> > > index eff6819..7b35d7f 100644
> > > --- a/libavformat/mpegts.c
> > > +++ b/libavformat/mpegts.c
> > > @@ -835,6 +835,13 @@ static int mpegts_set_stream_info(AVStream *st, PESContext *pes,
> > >          st->codec->codec_id  = old_codec_id;
> > >          st->codec->codec_type = old_codec_type;
> > >      }
> > > +    if ((st->codec->codec_id == AV_CODEC_ID_NONE || st->request_probe == 1) &&
> > > +        !avcodec_is_open(st->codec) &&
> > > +        stream_type ==  6) {
> > > +        st->codec->codec_type = AVMEDIA_TYPE_DATA;
> > > +        st->codec->codec_id   = AV_CODEC_ID_BIN_DATA;
> > > +        st->request_probe = 1;
> > > +    }
> > >  
> > >      return 0;
> > >  }
> > 
> > First things first: It's breaking fate-acodec-s302m for me.
> 
> make sure you use latest git master of ffmpeg, there was a commit
> rather recently that is needed

Sorry, I had missed that. fate-acodec-s302m is passing now. I haven't
waited until all tests finished, but I think it will be all right.

> if that doesnt work with your file then please provide that file
> 
> 
> [...]
> > If in your patch the request_probe value is set to a higher value, like
> > e.g. 10, avformat_find_stream_info() behaves nicely and I do not need
> > to reset the value manually. fate-acodec-s302m is still broken, though.
> 
> yes, the value will need finetuning, whats the more or less lowest
> that results in 100% reliable detection ?

My test case is already happy with a value as low as 2. I can not test
much more right now, though. I don't really feel good, with having such
a low threshold. Maybe the number could be made configurable? (I always
like configurable ;-) ).

> 
> [...]
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20150612/208dcc5a/attachment.asc>