[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] library.mak: add rpath to shared libraries

Ganesh Ajjanagadde gajjanag at mit.edu
Sun Jun 28 01:18:58 CEST 2015


On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanag at mit.edu> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.leppkes at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> <gajjanagadde at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Fixes Ticket4673
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde at gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>  library.mak | 2 +-
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/library.mak b/library.mak
>>> index 29460b8..401da7c 100644
>>> --- a/library.mak
>>> +++ b/library.mak
>>> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ $(SUBDIR)$(SLIBNAME): $(SUBDIR)$(SLIBNAME_WITH_MAJOR)
>>>
>>>  $(SUBDIR)$(SLIBNAME_WITH_MAJOR): $(OBJS) $(SLIBOBJS) $(SUBDIR)lib$(NAME).ver
>>>         $(SLIB_CREATE_DEF_CMD)
>>> -       $$(LD) $(SHFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $$(LD_O) $$(filter %.o,$$^) $(FFEXTRALIBS)
>>> +       $$(LD) $(SHFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $(LDEXEFLAGS) $$(LD_O) $$(filter %.o,$$^) $(FFEXTRALIBS)
>>>         $(SLIB_EXTRA_CMD)
>>
>> LDEXEFLAGS is clearly not the appropriate way to go about this. These
>> flags are for executables, not for shared libraries.
>>
>> - Hendrik
>
> Ok, so is it fine if this gets added to LDFLAGS instead? Or should a
> separate e.g LDLIBFLAGS be used?

Attached is new patch that creates a LDLIBFLAGS.

>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
>> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
>> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-build-add-LDLIBFLAGS.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2577 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20150627/5ca23584/attachment.bin>


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list