[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/developer: Add patchwork mentioning to "patch submission checklist"

Michael Niedermayer michael at niedermayer.cc
Fri Sep 16 10:07:01 EEST 2016

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:53:58PM -0800, Lou Logan wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 14:27:07 +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > yes one can ignore it but its alot more usefull if people keep in
> > mind that theres patchwork.
> The patch submission checklist is lengthy.
> I'm fine with an addition somewhere in doc/developer pointing out that
> it exists and how to use it if the patch submitter wants to, but I don't
> think it needs to be in the checklist.

where should it be put / where would you suggest to put it ?

Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give
it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For
even the very wise cannot see all ends. -- Gandalf
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20160916/3983e6ef/attachment.sig>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list