[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lswr: remove support for libsoxr resampling

Michael Niedermayer michael at niedermayer.cc
Mon Mar 6 14:55:22 EET 2017


On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:19:48AM +0000, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> The soxr resampler is slower and worse than the swr resampler,
> hence drop the former.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnuker at gmail.com>
> ---
>  Changelog                           |   1 +
>  MAINTAINERS                         |   1 -
>  configure                           |   5 +-
>  doc/resampler.texi                  |  53 ++++-----------
>  libswresample/Makefile              |   1 -
>  libswresample/options.c             |   7 --
>  libswresample/resample.c            |   2 +-
>  libswresample/soxr_resample.c       | 130 ------------------------------------
>  libswresample/swresample.c          |  18 +----
>  libswresample/swresample.h          |   7 --
>  libswresample/swresample_internal.h |   9 +--
>  11 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 213 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 libswresample/soxr_resample.c

the way soxr resamples is different from how swr implements it, that
could result in different advantages and disadvantages.
I would expect "which is better" to depend on what is meassured

i also think this should be CC-ed to rob, thus adding him to CC

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety -- Benjamin Franklin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20170306/b0659eef/attachment.sig>


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list