[FFmpeg-devel] [DECISION] Project policy on closed source components
Carl Eugen Hoyos
ceffmpeg at gmail.com
Mon Apr 29 20:47:33 EEST 2019
2019-04-29 1:02 GMT+02:00, Marton Balint <cus at passwd.hu>:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2019, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2019-04-28 22:02 GMT+02:00, Marton Balint <cus at passwd.hu>:
>>> 1) Should libNDI support be removed from the ffmpeg codebase?
>> This sounds to me as if you know of an alternative to not endorsing
>> a company that profits from FFmpeg while at the same time
>> violating the copyright of the FFmpeg developers?
>> What could this alternative be?
> We could list them on our webpage hall of shame, or whatever.
Could you be more specific?
Both about the "webpage" and about our suggested message of
both endorsing and shaming a software company at the same time?
> To be frank, I consider this vote to be more important for our
> project/community to make sure everyone's voice is heard,
> than the actual outcome.
I probably fail to parse this sentence as it makes no sense
whatsoever to me;-(
More information about the ffmpeg-devel