[FFmpeg-user] ffvhuff codec improvement

[Carl Eugen Hoyos]

Peter B. <pb <at> das-werkstatt.com> writes:

> >> If yes, ffvhuff would be a very good lossless 
> >> mezzanine codec for SD and HD.
> >
> > What's wrong with ffv1?
> > (Which produces significantly smaller files iirc.)
> 
> Of course, we all know that FFV1 rocks for lossless use! ;)
> I think what buddhabauch is looking for is just a very 
> fast lossless codec for mezzanine usage.

I simply didn't understand "mezzanine".

Is ffvhuff always faster than ffv1? Even 
with heavy multi-threading?

Carl Eugen