[FFmpeg-user] Hello and newbie question
phil_rhodes at rocketmail.com
Tue Feb 11 18:28:12 CET 2014
>> Obviously the version that comes with ubuntu is not
>> "deliberately" broken
No. Obviously, nobody ever deliberately breaks software.
Let me explain: computers are machines designed to do work for humans, and these machines work according to a from a series of enc
The security issues are not just known, actual
issues with avconv were reported to us by the avconv
side (and we verified that they are not reproducible
with FFmpeg). Response time for such issues seems to
be many months in avconv (historically).
Consider to (carefully) read J00ru's blog entry. I
believe it really explains a lot.
> and both versions contain "hundreds of known bugs"
But I of course did not claim that FFmpeg contains
no known bugs. I also did not claim that FFmpeg
contains no bugs that are not reproducible with avconv.
But I do claim (and it is extremely easy to verify)
that there are a magnitude (actually two) more bugs in
avconv that are not reproducible with FFmpeg than the
other way around. Just test a not too small number of
fixed trac tickets with avconv and look at some open
bugs on bugzilla (they often contain references to
And please stop trolling here, it is not welcome!
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user at ffmpeg.org
More information about the ffmpeg-user