[FFmpeg-user] Strange latency with some codecs

Simon Pickles pickles at thefoundry.co.uk
Wed Jul 23 11:18:23 CEST 2014


Hi Carl,

Thanks for the response.

I've cloned the git repo, built it and repro'd the problem with the example
code I first posted. Here's the output:

kludge:MacOS pickles$ ./TestApp
1 streams
Codec
    PTS=0, DTS=0, Duration=1, KeyFrame=1, Corrupt=0, StreamIdx=0,
PktSize=77686
Decode 77686 frameDecoded 0
Decode 77686 frameDecoded 0
Decode 77686 frameDecoded 0
Decode 77686 frameDecoded 0
Decode 77686 frameDecoded 0
Decode 77686 frameDecoded 0
Decode 77686 frameDecoded 0
Decode 77686 frameDecoded 0
Decode 77686 frameDecoded 0
Decode 77686 frameDecoded 0
Decode 77686 frameDecoded 0
Decode 77686 frameDecoded 0
Decode 77686 frameDecoded 0
Decode 77686 frameDecoded 0
Decode 77686 frameDecoded 0
Decode 77686 frameDecoded 1
Decode 77686 frameDecoded 1
Decode 77686 frameDecoded 1
Decode 77686 frameDecoded 1
Decode 77686 frameDecoded 1


Here's the build info:

kludge:bin pickles$ ./ffmpeg
ffmpeg version 2.2.git Copyright (c) 2000-2014 the FFmpeg developers
  built on Jul 23 2014 10:15:55 with gcc 4.0.1 (GCC) (Apple Inc. build 5494)
  configuration:
--prefix=/workspace/pickles/ffmpeg/git_20140723/bin/mac-64-x86-release-10.6
--arch=x86_64 --cc=gcc-4.0 --extra-cflags=' -arch x86_64 -O3 -fPIC
-I/workspace/pickles/ffmpeg/git_20140723/bin/mac-64-x86-release-10.6/include'
--extra-ldflags='-L/workspace/pickles/ffmpeg/git_20140723/bin/mac-64-x86-release-10.6/lib
-arch x86_64' --enable-shared --disable-static --disable-ffplay
--disable-ffserver --disable-bzlib --disable-devices
--yasmexe=/workspace/pickles/ffmpeg/git_20140723/bin/mac-64-x86-release-10.6/bin/yasm
  libavutil      52. 92.101 / 52. 92.101
  libavcodec     55. 69.100 / 55. 69.100
  libavformat    55. 48.101 / 55. 48.101
  libavdevice    55. 13.102 / 55. 13.102
  libavfilter     4. 11.102 /  4. 11.102
  libswscale      2.  6.100 /  2.  6.100
  libswresample   0. 19.100 /  0. 19.100


On 22 July 2014 17:43, Carl Eugen Hoyos <cehoyos at ag.or.at> wrote:

> Simon Pickles <pickles <at> thefoundry.co.uk> writes:
>
> > I've just upgraded from FFmpeg 1.0 to 2.1.4
>
> Given that 2.1 is very close to eol and 2.3
> is binary compatible, this is really not a
> good idea.
>
> Additionally, if you found a bug (I don't know
> the issue you describe), you will have to test
> if is reproducible with current FFmpeg.
>
> Carl Eugen
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-user mailing list
> ffmpeg-user at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
>


More information about the ffmpeg-user mailing list