[FFmpeg-user] flac format
paulyurt at gmail.com
Fri Sep 1 17:14:31 EEST 2017
> On Sep 1, 2017, at 9:21 AM, Cley Faye <cleyfaye at gmail.com> wrote:
> If you convert the WAV to an other format you will have an approximation
> of the original data with the limitations of the codec of choice. FLAC
> claims to be lossless and offering about 50% storage savings.
> Storage is inexpensive why change the format and lose the original?
For the record, FLAC is lossless: going wav -> flac -> wav recreate the
exact same file, byte by byte.
I can see a few cases where smaller size for the same data is better: it
use less storage (obviously), transfer faster over internet/over other
networks, less memory bandwidth with hardware decoder (granted FLAC
hardware decoder are not that common). I see no advantage, when possible,
to not compress stuff, especially when the process is very fast in both
directions. Processing power is inexpensive too :)
There is something to say for playing an original file when it's almost universally playable by hardware at the binary level :)
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user at ffmpeg.org
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
More information about the ffmpeg-user