[FFmpeg-user] Matroska Container, FFV1 Codec and GPU Encoding
Sebastian.Wilk at stud.hs-coburg.de
Fri Sep 15 16:33:56 EEST 2017
Yes, so it was pretty much what I was getting out of it, just the wording threw me off.
Thanks for clearing it up!
Von: ffmpeg-user <ffmpeg-user-bounces at ffmpeg.org> im Auftrag von Kieran O Leary <kieran.o.leary at gmail.com>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. September 2017 14:56
An: FFmpeg user questions
Betreff: Re: [FFmpeg-user] Matroska Container, FFV1 Codec and GPU Encoding
On 14 Sep 2017 11:52, "Wilk, Sebastian" <Sebastian.Wilk at stud.hs-coburg.de>
I am a bit puzzled about your last paragraph
>We just use a v210 capture ->FFv1 ffmpeg transcode with losslessness
>verification via framemd5 though.
Is there a specific reason(s) for the capture step at the beginning? To my
understanding I could use Ffmpeg just like any other Encoder (Handbrake) to
convert my files, or am I missing something?
By capture I meant migration a videotape to a digital file. Currently, we
capture videotape signals as uncompressed 10bit v210 files. It's this file
that we transcode to FFV1. Does that make sense?
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user at ffmpeg.org
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
More information about the ffmpeg-user