[FFmpeg-user] libx265 a lot slower
markfilipak.windows+ffmpeg at gmail.com
Mon Aug 17 03:07:17 EEST 2020
On 08/16/2020 05:30 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 16.08.20 um 19:14 schrieb Carl Zwanzig:
>> Reindl is known for acerbic and unhelpful answers, AFAICT most readers
>> ignore them.
> there is nothing acerbic or unhelpful point to common sense that a new
> codec with better quality or smaller files (and if both is ecpected)
> comes with a logical cost
That is illogical. There is no reason why one should expect that libx265 will take longer to encode.
If you have information to the contrary, you could cite it instead of being insulting.
> there is also nothing acerbic or unhelpful point to common sense that
> every "look here how good xyz is" is based on best-case and never
> reflects the reality
That is also illogical.
More information about the ffmpeg-user