[FFmpeg-user] question about fps filter
asheimo at gmail.com
Wed May 27 19:16:10 EEST 2020
The output file is how I noticed the issue it was reporting original frame
rate as 24000/1001 and current frame rate as 30000/1001.
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 1:43 AM Edward Park <kumowoon1025 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I found this in the debug output and am not sure why it sees what was
> > passed by the command line but then is ignored in the filter graph can
> > someone help me understand please? The complete debug output is available
> > but too big to include here.
> > [Parsed_yadif_cuda_0 @ 00000220ac5561c0] Setting 'deint' to value
> > 'interlaced'
> > [Parsed_fps_1 @ 00000220ac74a500] Setting 'fps' to value '24000/1001'
> > [Parsed_fps_1 @ 00000220ac74a500] fps=24000/1001
> > [graph 0 input from stream 0:0 @ 00000220ac749f40] Setting 'video_size'
> > value '720x480'
> > [graph 0 input from stream 0:0 @ 00000220ac749f40] Setting 'pix_fmt' to
> > value '119'
> > [graph 0 input from stream 0:0 @ 00000220ac749f40] Setting 'time_base' to
> > value '1/1000'
> > [graph 0 input from stream 0:0 @ 00000220ac749f40] Setting 'pixel_aspect'
> > to value '186/157'
> > [graph 0 input from stream 0:0 @ 00000220ac749f40] Setting 'frame_rate'
> > value '30000/1001'
> > [graph 0 input from stream 0:0 @ 00000220ac749f40] w:720 h:480
> > tb:1/1000 fr:30000/1001 sar:186/157
> This doesn't necessarily mean the fps was ignored, it just means the input
> has that frame rate. As you've said it looks like the argument to the fps
> filter was parsed correctly, the message being logged before doesn't mean
> anything (it wasn't later overridden to 30000/1001 or anything). Is the
> output file 30000/1001 fps?
> Ted Park
> ffmpeg-user mailing list
> ffmpeg-user at ffmpeg.org
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-user-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
More information about the ffmpeg-user