[FFmpeg-user] Why FFMPEG?
tschikruma at gmail.com
Mon Aug 16 01:26:39 EEST 2021
I think if a libaom on the smartphone is not too slow then VVC either.
Simply -cpu-used 8 and it's 15 times faster with only a 2% loss of storage
efficiency. With 10 times the complexity, one expects 40% more storage
efficiency. That without cpu-used 8 is like placebo with AVC or HEVC. But
with it works. The 2011 PC probably cost more than I've ever spent on
smartphones. I even think that because more and more projects, for example
on github, start immediately as Android and / or iOS projects and PCs lose
relevance faster and faster, people who compulsively rely on PCs probably
rely on a medium that will no longer be relevant in maybe 15 years and the
people who still bet on it then fall off the back. And nothing is worse
and more ridiculous than conversational computer hobbyists.
Marton Balint <cus at passwd.hu> schrieb am Mo., 16. Aug. 2021, 00:04:
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2021, Android PowerUser wrote:
> > The use case is simple:
> > why do we use codecs at all:
> > It's easy, files will simply become incredibly large. Stream would be
> > impossible and send via Whatsapp (16 MB lock). Saving on a low budget
> > device would also not be possible. Then of course you also want the most
> > memory-efficient.
> There are a lot of other considerations at play. Device compatiblity, for
> example. Or licensing cost of using the codecs. HW capacity needed to
> _encode_ the videos. So no, typically you don't want the newest codecs
> with the slowest presets for any real use case.
> ffmpeg-user mailing list
> ffmpeg-user at ffmpeg.org
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-user-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
More information about the ffmpeg-user