<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#CCCCCC" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/13/14 10:53 AM, Ken Bass wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAH5g024sx5=qJTb1Gc6PiBNt_DejK9Mpq-PEeoucE0FNuUxLOA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
The only one to really blame, I guess, is google ( is that
like blaming g*d?), since that is how I got the first,
outdated, link. Don't know how to fix that.<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
This happened to me too<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAH5g024sx5=qJTb1Gc6PiBNt_DejK9Mpq-PEeoucE0FNuUxLOA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>In a previous life, I was a sw
designer/architect/company. So from that experience, might I
suggest that for those older versions of the documentation,
putting (noticeable) text somewhere stating that that isn't
the "current" version, and perhaps with a link to the
current version. That would have saved me many days of
hitting that brick wall. But then, this is only a
suggestion. You guys are the experts, and obviously good
ones at that :-). Thanks for great (open src) software.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
You'll find that its common in open source projects for past
versions of the documentation to be browse-able from the web, and
you'll also find that open source projects tend to assume much of
the user's knowledge level. For that I wish you luck. <br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAH5g024sx5=qJTb1Gc6PiBNt_DejK9Mpq-PEeoucE0FNuUxLOA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>And thx, Joshua, for your response.<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
You're welcome!<br>
</body>
</html>