[FFmpeg-user] libx265 a lot slower

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Mon Aug 17 09:35:56 EEST 2020

Am 17.08.20 um 08:30 schrieb Mark Filipak:
> On 08/17/2020 02:24 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 17.08.20 um 02:07 schrieb Mark Filipak:
>>> On 08/16/2020 05:30 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>> Am 16.08.20 um 19:14 schrieb Carl Zwanzig:
>>>>> Reindl is known for acerbic and unhelpful answers, AFAICT most readers
>>>>> ignore them.
>>>> there is nothing acerbic or unhelpful point to common sense that a new
>>>> codec with better quality or smaller files (and if both is ecpected)
>>>> comes with a logical cost
>>> That is illogical. There is no reason why one should expect that libx265
>>> will take longer to encode. If you have information to the contrary, you
>>> could cite it instead of being insulting.
>> i can't teach you common sense
> Troll

well, try to encode H264 or even *decode* it on hardware from20 years
ago where other video codecs existed

nobody right in his brain can expect a codec based on H264 with better
quality *and* lower filesize coming without any cost

More information about the ffmpeg-user mailing list