[Ffmpeg-cvslog] CVS: ffmpeg/libavcodec dsputil.c, 1.123, 1.124 dsputil.h, 1.117, 1.118 h264.c, 1.136, 1.137
Måns Rullgård
mru
Sat Jun 18 12:01:19 CEST 2005
- Previous message: [Ffmpeg-cvslog] CVS: ffmpeg/libavcodec dsputil.c, 1.123, 1.124 dsputil.h, 1.117, 1.118 h264.c, 1.136, 1.137
- Next message: [Ffmpeg-cvslog] CVS: ffmpeg/libavcodec avcodec.h, 1.401, 1.402 bitstream.h, 1.152, 1.153 h263.c, 1.282, 1.283 h263dec.c, 1.167, 1.168 motion_est.c, 1.105, 1.106 mpegvideo.c, 1.484, 1.485 mpegvideo.h, 1.224, 1.225 utils.c, 1.142, 1.143
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Loren Merritt <lorenm at u.washington.edu> writes:
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, [iso-8859-1] M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>>
>> I've made some progress, but it still doesn't look quite right.
>> Could you take a look at the pictures in
>> http://inprovide.com/~mru/h264_scaling/, and see if you have any idea
>> what the problem might be?
>
> No clue.
Well, I have one. I think the DC coefficients are being scaled
incorrectly. Notice the too light/dark 16x16 blocks that appear. I
found a few uses of dequant_coeffs that I missed the first time
around, and also read the standard a bit more carefully. It's a bit
of a pain sometimes to figure out which part of the code maps to
various parts of the standard, the latter not exactly being optimized
the way the code is.
--
M?ns Rullg?rd
mru at inprovide.com
- Previous message: [Ffmpeg-cvslog] CVS: ffmpeg/libavcodec dsputil.c, 1.123, 1.124 dsputil.h, 1.117, 1.118 h264.c, 1.136, 1.137
- Next message: [Ffmpeg-cvslog] CVS: ffmpeg/libavcodec avcodec.h, 1.401, 1.402 bitstream.h, 1.152, 1.153 h263.c, 1.282, 1.283 h263dec.c, 1.167, 1.168 motion_est.c, 1.105, 1.106 mpegvideo.c, 1.484, 1.485 mpegvideo.h, 1.224, 1.225 utils.c, 1.142, 1.143
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the ffmpeg-cvslog
mailing list