[Ffmpeg-cvslog] CVS: ffmpeg/libavcodec avcodec.h, 1.393, 1.394ffv1.c, 1.32, 1.33 g726.c, 1.5, 1.6 h263.c, 1.279, 1.280 huffyuv.c, 1.61, 1.62 mpeg12.c, 1.235, 1.236 mpegvideo.c, 1.480, 1.481 snow.c, 1.60, 1.61
The Wanderer
inverseparadox
Tue May 10 02:59:14 CEST 2005
- Previous message: [Ffmpeg-cvslog] CVS: ffmpeg/libavcodec avcodec.h, 1.393, 1.394ffv1.c, 1.32, 1.33 g726.c, 1.5, 1.6 h263.c, 1.279, 1.280 huffyuv.c, 1.61, 1.62 mpeg12.c, 1.235, 1.236 mpegvideo.c, 1.480, 1.481 snow.c, 1.60, 1.61
- Next message: [Ffmpeg-cvslog] CVS: ffmpeg/libavcodec avcodec.h, 1.393, 1.394ffv1.c, 1.32, 1.33 g726.c, 1.5, 1.6 h263.c, 1.279, 1.280 huffyuv.c, 1.61, 1.62 mpeg12.c, 1.235, 1.236 mpegvideo.c, 1.480, 1.481 snow.c, 1.60, 1.61
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> The Wanderer <inverseparadox at comcast.net> writes:
>
>> M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>>> There's really not much point in discussing opinions on whether
>>> or not some particular combination of letters forms a word.
>>> Either it is, or it isn't, and any debate on the subject would
>>> have to be based around verifiable facts backing the arguments
>>> brought forth.
>>
>> True; that is why I listed "opinion" as potentially irrelevant. As
>> a datapoint, however, as well as a potential indicator of what
>> would and would not be viewed as valid by the reading audience, my
>> experience may well have some bearing; this was roughly the
>> intended thrust of the above sentence.
>
> If you had cared to mention what this experience might be made up of,
> I would possibly have given your opinion stronger weight.
Sorry, I didn't think that needed mentioning, since there's nothing more
specific than "a lifetime of reading and speaking English". No more than
any other individual's ordinary experience might count for - i.e.,
primarily just a datapoint.
[native speaker of English]
>>> As am I, at least to some extent, despite my name.
>>
>> Okay; I based the presumption that you weren't on the TLD from
>> which you post, though now that I look at it more closely I
>> actually have no idea what language(s) is (are) spoken there.
>> Apologies.
>
> Does .com have any geographic connotations these days? Or were you
> thinking of .cx? That's the Christmas Island, to which I have never
> been, and know nothing about. In case you're curious, I am presently
> in Norway, and no, English is not an official language here.
Yes, .cx, the domain from which the message to which I had been replying
was posted - which as soon as I thought about it I did recognize as
"Christmas Island". I guess that, for this purpose, they're just a msil
service of some sort...
>>> Now let's get back to coding instead. There it is so much easier
>>> to say what is right and what is not.
>>
>> ...which, since it doesn't get anything changed, conveniently
>> leaves the side you were arguing for as 'winning' by default... but
>> okay, I'll drop the subject, for at least the time being.
>
> Well, in the end it's Michael's call. Whichever way he decides, I
> won't argue.
Right. Michael? Any opinion, or do we just leave this lie?
--
The Wanderer
Warning: Simply because I argue an issue does not mean I agree with any
side of it.
A government exists to serve its citizens, not to control them.
- Previous message: [Ffmpeg-cvslog] CVS: ffmpeg/libavcodec avcodec.h, 1.393, 1.394ffv1.c, 1.32, 1.33 g726.c, 1.5, 1.6 h263.c, 1.279, 1.280 huffyuv.c, 1.61, 1.62 mpeg12.c, 1.235, 1.236 mpegvideo.c, 1.480, 1.481 snow.c, 1.60, 1.61
- Next message: [Ffmpeg-cvslog] CVS: ffmpeg/libavcodec avcodec.h, 1.393, 1.394ffv1.c, 1.32, 1.33 g726.c, 1.5, 1.6 h263.c, 1.279, 1.280 huffyuv.c, 1.61, 1.62 mpeg12.c, 1.235, 1.236 mpegvideo.c, 1.480, 1.481 snow.c, 1.60, 1.61
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the ffmpeg-cvslog
mailing list