[FFmpeg-cvslog] r9952 - trunk/doc/faq.texi

[Michael Niedermayer]

Hi

On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 01:30:20PM +0200, V?ctor Paesa wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 8/6/07, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 11:51:13PM +0200, V?ctor Paesa wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > --- trunk/doc/faq.texi  (original)
> > > > +++ trunk/doc/faq.texi  Sun Aug  5 22:44:37 2007
> > > > @@ -311,6 +311,10 @@ rm temp[12].[av] all.[av]
> > > >
> > > >  yes, (@url{http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.ffmpeg.user})
> > > >
> > > > + at section what is thread hijacking?
> > > > +
> > > > +see (@url{http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_hijacking})
> > > > +
> > > >
> > > >  @chapter Development
> > >
> > > Looks redundant,
> >
> > well then why do so many people do it none the less on ffmpeg-user?
> 
> Maybe because they can't read, and hence I doubt they will read this FAQ entry
> (or any other) ;-)

that would be great, because then we could just obfuscate the ffmpeg-user and
ffmpeg-devel addresses a little and explain precisely how to deobfuscate them
(after explaining what thread hijacking and top posting is)
?


> More seriously, documentation duplication makes as less sense as code
> duplication.

just revert it ...


[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being
governed by those who are dumber. -- Plato 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-cvslog/attachments/20070806/27f48225/attachment.pgp>