[Ffmpeg-devel] Matroska Patch

[Måns Rullgård]

Steve Lhomme <steve.lhomme at free.fr> writes:

> Rich Felker wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 02:16:32AM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 07:19:58PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 08:22:37PM +0000, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>>>>>> So, everybody agrees that block_time is a better mnemonic ?
>>>> Not everybody, and you know it.. There have been at least two people
>>>> (and one other than my irrelevant self) who have spoken against it.
>>> I have heard nobody speak up against a different (better) variable name.
>> I still want to hear Steve's explanation of the error message. He
>> conveniently goes silent when we ask, of course...
>
> Sorry, but I have a life. I don't spend my time waiting for your
> emails to answer right away.
>
> We have moved to MSVC2005 recently and there's no problem with

Good.  Then we can leave it.

> time. As I said it may come (again) from MinGW, but I haven't tried.
>
> Anyway "timestamp" is not as good. This function deals with cluster
> time, block time and display time. They are all separate
> variables. And I think an appropriate name for each would help anyone
> new to Matroska reading the code.

Anyone new to matroska would do best to stay that way.

-- 
M?ns Rullg?rd
mru at inprovide.com