[Ffmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [Visibility] libavutil

[Rich Felker]

On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 03:10:36AM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 September 2006 03:01, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > Repeating this hunk in every file is unacceptable IMO. ?It should be in
> > config.h or something similar.
> The problem is that it needs to be present for external software to use 
> FFmpeg, or they'll all have to define EXPORTED by themselves (and might 
> define it wrong).

Uhg, it can just be defined to empty in this case; however I dislike
this whole mess. Can't the relevant issue (symbol resolution
performance) just be fixed with -Bsymbolic or 'protected' visibility
and avoid this hideous 'hidden' mess?!

Rich