[FFmpeg-devel] Contract offer for implementing decoding functionality for interlaced AVCHD (5000 Euro + optional 1000 Euro Bonus)
Robert Krüger
krueger
Sun Jun 1 14:38:09 CEST 2008
We would like to offer a reward of 5000 Euro for the implementation of
decoding functionality for AVCHD files generated by Sony camera models
HDR-CX-6/HDR-SR8E (files should be identical for both models).
The conditions are the following:
* Code has to be LGPL (i.e. an extension of the existing H.264
decoder in libavcodec)
* The ffmpeg/ffplay version using the thus developed code has to be
able to perform the following tasks:
o Transcode the sample files provided by us into a
progressive H.264 (using libx264 and libxvid) stream in an mp4 container
without audio/video sync problems in one ffmpeg command line call
o Play back the sample files provided by us using ffplay
(provided the hardware is powerful enough, of course) without
audio/video sync problems
* Code has to be accepted into SVN by the maintainers of this project
* The first payment of 2000 Euro will be made once a patch sent to
us fulfills the functional requirements outlined above
* The remaining 3000 will be paid, once code has been accepted into SVN
* The entire process has to be completed within 4 weeks time
* An additional bonus of 1000 Euro will be paid if it is done in 2
weeks
* People who are interested in the job contact us (my email
address), we confirm that they got the job and time counts from that
confirmation on
* Payment method is up to you but we will be needing some sort of
formal invoice
The sample files have been uploaded to the upload.mplayerhq.hu FTP
server to
/MPlayer/incoming/sony-hdr-cx6-avchd-interlaced-decoding-problem and a
bug report has been filed as issue 475.
If someone wants more (e.g. larger) samples, please contact us. We will
provide you a download URL.
The current SVN can transcode/play the files but the result is an out of
sync slow motion video because the frames are effectively doubled during
the decoding process (which some people said has something to do with
PAFF not being implemented fully/properly but I am not competent to
confirm that).
If there are any questions regarding requirements or conditions, please
contact me.
Best regards,
Robert
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list