[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] add libopencore support for AMR variants

[Ramiro Polla]

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:05:10AM -0300, Ramiro Polla wrote:
>> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 08:55:32PM -0300, Ramiro Polla wrote:
>> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> wrote:
>> >> > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 07:17:30PM -0300, Ramiro Polla wrote:
>> >> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> wrote:
>> >> >> > The LGPL v3 configure changes would be committed separately.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > @@ -2386,6 +2402,9 @@
>> >> >> > ?license="LGPL version 2.1 or later"
>> >> >> > ?if enabled nonfree; then
>> >> >> > ? ? ?license="nonfree and unredistributable"
>> >> >> > +elif enabled lgplv3; then
>> >> >> > + ? ?license="LGPL version 3 or later"
>> >> >> > + ? ?enabled gpl && license="GPL version 3 or later"
>> >> >> > ?elif enabled gpl; then
>> >> >> > ? ? ?license="GPL version 2 or later"
>> >> >> > ?fi
>> >> >>
>> >> >> lgpl v3 + gpl = gpl v3 ?
>> >> >
>> >> > Yes of course, what else?
>> >>
>> >> lgplv3 implying that gpl will be v3 is not entirely obvious.
>> >
>> > What makes you think otherwise?
>>
>> This might lead to misinterpretations like "but I only wanted lgpl to
>> be v3. I wanted the rest to be whatever is the default. that's what I
>> asked for in configure". And before you suggest that only retarted
>> people would think that, look again at the license violations on
>> roundup...
>
> You are right that we should try to make this as foolproof as possible.
> How about $attached?

I like that much better. Thanks...

Ramiro Polla