[FFmpeg-devel] [RELEASE] ffmpeg-0.6.90-rc0
Mikhail I. Izmestev
im at cgtribe.com
Mon Apr 4 15:49:43 CEST 2011
04.04.2011 16:56, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 02:33:48PM +0400, Mikhail I. Izmestev wrote:
>> 03.04.2011 21:13, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> Iam proud to announce that after a way too long time we finally are
>>> making a new release.
>>> See: http://ffmpeg.org/releases/
>>> Please help test it and report regression& security bugs to
>>> ffmpeg.org/trac so we can fix them in rc1 or the final release.
>>> (depending on if we will need a rc1)
>>> Also please help testing on not so common platforms if you can. (as you
>>> know the 3 server admins took all machines they had access to with
>>> them for their fork)
>> I'm not sure, but I have tested ffmpeg at
>> 2cae9809e2d59c7336fc2cccb97b82c7f764868a on win7 and have performance
>> $ time ./ffmpeg.exe -i BackgroundLoopBlueHorizon.mov -sameq -f rawvideo
>> -> /dev/null
>> FFmpeg version UNKNOWN, Copyright (c) 2000-2011 the FFmpeg developers
>> built on Apr 4 2011 14:14:06 with gcc 4.4.0 20090326 (experimental)
>> configuration: --enable-shared --disable-static --enable-memalign-hack
>> --disable-avfilter --arch=x86_64 --cross-prefix=x86_64-pc-mingw32-
>> --disable-dxva2 --disable-yasm
> disable-yasm is a bad idea, you should install yasm
Yes you are right, enabling yasm make it some better, but it still slower.
> also please show us your config.h of both versions
> and if you can figure out which revission causes the slowdown for you
> with "git bisect" thats easy, this would help
I have no config.h for old build, will try to bisect.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel