[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] ffmpeg.org deuglify shame

Michael Niedermayer michaelni at gmx.at
Sat Apr 23 11:15:41 CEST 2011


On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 04:40:01PM -0800, Lou Logan wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 02:14:26 +0200
> Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 03:23:09PM -0800, Lou Logan wrote:
> > > Put violator entries in table instead of list. Fix broken links.
> > >  shame |  478
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 325 insertions(+), 153 deletions(-)
> > > 2e897b0bbdcd57a6fdd65fc56c0ad84a2eec6b9d
> > > ffmpeg-web_deuglify_shame.patch
> > 
> > the links work fine for me, besides i was thinking of droping the
> > shame page entirely.
> 
> For what reasons? Is the Hall of Shame effective enough in gaining
> compliance and awareness for us to keep maintaining it?

I didnt follow it precissly but ive difficulty naming a single company
that stoped violating because of that page.



> 
> > If we keep it, i agree that a table is better than a list
> 
> New patch attached with links reverted if we decide to keep shame.

that change should be fine (didnt look precissely, the one
applying should check it looks ok)

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Concerning the gods, I have no means of knowing whether they exist or not
or of what sort they may be, because of the obscurity of the subject, and
the brevity of human life -- Protagoras
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20110423/804785d2/attachment.asc>


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list