[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] source snapshots back in action since a long time

[compn]

On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:15:28 +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 01:26:16PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 12:10:21AM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 10:05:33PM +0200, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
>> > > On 3/1/11, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbultje at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <cehoyos at ag.or.at> wrote:
>> > > >> Michael Niedermayer <michaelni <at> gmx.at> writes:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> Ive just found out that my SVN write account to the homepage has been
>> > > >>> closed too as i tried to access it.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> There are snapshots of of the official repository at videolan since a
>> > > >>> long time
>> > > >>> Please commit this patch.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Done.
>> > > >
>> > > > Reverted. Please don't do that again.
>> > > >
>> > > > We can probably put a link to Michael's git repo nightly tarballs, but
>> > > > please discuss that along with the rest of us in the thread where
>> > > > Diego posted his patch. You are not exempt from the patch-posting and
>> > > > review rules that apply to all of us.
>> > > 
>> > > So I guess that now the roots would revoke the svn commit writes of
>> > > everybody who is not one of the masters.
>> > 
>> > You will sleep better knowing that Michael revoked my commit access
>> > to the videolan.org tree.
>> 
>> This is at least the second time you state this lie. And ive previously already
>> told you to stop lieing about this. Its very easy to proof if you had an
>> account that was revoked or not
>
>You instructed Janne to not accept my ssh key for account creation.
>Happier with that wording?  Anyway, I'm out of this pissing contest.

they are different things.

michael never had access to git.ffmpeg iirc
just like you never had access to git.videolan.

but i dont see michael saying his access was revoked to git.ffmpeg.

now what is troubling is that his access was revoked from mphq svn
ffmpeg.org repo. why he wasnt notified of this change, why there was no
public vote, why all of the svn policy was ignored. why did mans or you
remove the lead ffmpeg developer from editing the ffmpeg homepage? why
is fork-team refusing to call it a fork?