[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/libswresample: Fix most spelling mistakes
Stefano Sabatini
stefasab at gmail.com
Sun Nov 25 00:30:09 CET 2012
On date Saturday 2012-11-24 01:08:43 +0100, Stefano Sabatini encoded:
> On date Thursday 2012-11-22 23:58:49 +0100, Alexander Strasser encoded:
> > Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > > On date Wednesday 2012-11-14 00:18:45 +0100, Clément Bœsch encoded:
> > > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 03:11:02PM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > > + at setfilename libswresample
> > > > > + at settitle audio conversion library
> > >
> > > > Just like swscale, I'd add "resampling".
> > >
> > > "resampling" would be limited, since the library perform also other
> > > conversion as well (rematrixing, format conversion, repacking), which
> > > I put under the generic label "audio conversion".
> >
> > I am mildly for mentioning resampling here. The most understandable
> > for outsiders (that does not conflict with terms used in FFmpeg) would
> > probably be
> >
> > "audio resampling and sample format conversion library"
> >
> > so probably
> >
> > "audio resampling library"
> >
> > is the better choice.
>
> Changed.
>
> > I mean the purposes of the lib are explained right at the top of the
> > document, so users will quickly see it can do things beyond resampling.
> > I guess the term conversion in "audio conversion library" will also
> > make many think of conversion between audio file formats and codecs.
> >
> > But no strong opinion about this, just transmitting some thoughts
> > over the mailing list.
>
> Updated.
>
> I decided to keep this layout:
>
> - a dedicated manual for each ff* tool
>
> - a dedicated manual for each library, just listing a brief
> description (and possibly soon a link to Doxygen)
>
> - a dedicated manual for the library subcomponents (codecs, filters,
> formats, etc.), including the single objects provided by a library
> like in the case of the libswresample/libswscale libraries, which
> still resides in the "user" documentation space.
>
> This is meant to keep the documentation as modular as possible, and to
> keep tool and library documentation separated as much as possible.
>
> Keeping a *huge* complete tool page should be still possible, but that
> would imply some hacks to the build system.
> --
> FFmpeg = Fanciful and F*c*i*g MultiPurpose Eccentric Goblin
> From 064eae6cab49686d95f3849deedb2dd8084d594d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stefano Sabatini <stefasab at gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 12:24:04 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] doc: add libswresample.texi and ffmpeg-resampler.texi files
>
> ---
> doc/Makefile | 3 +-
> doc/ffmpeg-resampler.texi | 198 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> doc/libswresample.texi | 62 ++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 262 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 doc/ffmpeg-resampler.texi
> create mode 100644 doc/libswresample.texi
Applied.
--
FFmpeg = Faithful Free Mystic Perfectionist Elaborated Goblin
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list