[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] libavfilter/af_atempo: Fix uninitialized memory access
Paul B Mahol
onemda at gmail.com
Thu Apr 18 22:42:27 CEST 2013
On 4/18/13, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:33:34PM -0600, pkoshevoy at gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Pavel Koshevoy <pkoshevoy at gmail.com>
>>
>> valgrind reported uninitialized memory access which was caused by
>> incorrect number of samples being passed to push_samples(..)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Koshevoy <pkoshevoy at gmail.com>
>> ---
>> libavfilter/af_atempo.c | 6 ++++--
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/libavfilter/af_atempo.c b/libavfilter/af_atempo.c
>> index 3e2bc06..f5c5da8 100644
>> --- a/libavfilter/af_atempo.c
>> +++ b/libavfilter/af_atempo.c
>> @@ -1061,7 +1061,7 @@ static int filter_frame(AVFilterLink *inlink,
>> AVFrame *src_buffer)
>> ATempoContext *atempo = ctx->priv;
>> AVFilterLink *outlink = ctx->outputs[0];
>>
>> - int ret = 0;
>> + int ret = AVERROR(EAGAIN);
>> int n_in = src_buffer->nb_samples;
>> int n_out = (int)(0.5 + ((double)n_in) / atempo->tempo);
>>
>
> this looks odd, what is the intent of this change ?
Its unrelated to original problem, so should be disscussed separately.
>
> [...]
>
> --
> Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
>
> If you think the mosad wants you dead since a long time then you are either
> wrong or dead since a long time.
>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list