[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Reinstate proper FFmpeg license for all files.
Michael Niedermayer
michaelni at gmx.at
Wed Aug 28 16:35:46 CEST 2013
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 09:59:07AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> On date Thursday 2013-08-22 02:10:46 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 02:08:05PM -0400, compn wrote:
> > > On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:51:07 +0200, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
> > > >ping
> > >
> > > i am ok with changing project name in copyright headers.
> >
> > that makes 2 vote (compn & thilo) for applyig it, noone against unless
> > i missed someone
> >
> > some people voiced concerns about lavr
> > what about that, can people reach some consensus on that ?
> >
>
> > any other oppinons, comments ?
>
> I personally don't care much, my opinion is that you as overall
> maintainer should have the last word on it, especially considering
> that the issue tends to solicit bikeshedding.
I dont care much what the headers say as long as its not outright
missleading.
also an alternative to this patchset would be to remove both libav
and ffmpeg from the license headers
The question is what does the community and the authors prefer?
also, using the linux source
git grep -li 'Copyright' | wc
27234 27234 871728
git grep -ii 'This file is part of ' | wc
591 6356 47769
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
He who knows, does not speak. He who speaks, does not know. -- Lao Tsu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20130828/30dbf18f/attachment.asc>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list