[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 3/3] [RFC] mpegts: Support seeking based on stream timestamps.

wm4 nfxjfg at googlemail.com
Sun Sep 28 15:50:20 CEST 2014


On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 14:45:33 +0200
Reimar Döffinger <Reimar.Doeffinger at gmx.de> wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 01:52:45PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 13:37:59 +0200
> > Reimar Döffinger <Reimar.Doeffinger at gmx.de> wrote:
> > > > That's not how the libavformat seeking API works. If you want a
> > > > different layer, use something from the different layer. E.g. seek avio
> > > > directly, and flush the demuxer's buffers.
> > > 
> > > Which as you mention later is only possible with messy hacks.
> > 
> > All you need is something like av_format_flush(ctx).
> 
> To be honest I'm kind of shocked we don't have it.
> I am bit surprised that things even work as well as they do,
> MPlayer kind of assumes such a function is implemented in the demuxer.

The builtin demuxers apparently simply didn't need it. With
libavformat, there's data buffered for parsing at least.

> > So the question is: what do you do if your ts (or anything else) is
> > actually in a seekable file, and you don't want libavformat to invoke
> > the read_seek callback? This is not possible without having full
> > knowledge which formats call read_seek "just because", and which really
> > need it for working seeking.
> 
> I admit I would have assumed that you'd always want them to use read_seek if the
> stream layer provides one, including when they can seek (mostly?) fine
> without.
> 
> > > But then the speed difference is because you compare different implementations.
> > > Also this only applies to cases where the read_seek is not supported.
> > > In other cases the performance is unchanged.
> > 
> > But this is the more common case...
> 
> Yes, but it wasn't what I thought you were referring to, so
> misunderstanding here.
> 
> > > Also it only doubles the round-trip latency which if that really is significant is an issue that needs to be fixed at the source.
> > 
> > Probably, but note that MPlayer-style byte caches can be read and
> > seeked even if the underlying stream is stuck and blocked. And if that
> > is not an issue, why have a cache at all?
> 
> Because it is quite important for formats like MOV/MP4 where you
> constantly seek during playback, there every millisecond matters.
> For the seek itself I assumed that a few milliseconds extra are not
> a big deal.

True enough. Though... I don't know well enough about mp4 seek access
patterns (just that they're inefficient), but you can run into trouble
even with a large seekback cache.

> 
> > > > Absolutely nothing stops the application from doing its own seeking for
> > > > formats like mpeg-ts. Though what you need is a function that flushes
> > > > internal libavformat buffers to make sure no old data is read after the
> > > > stream-level seek was performed. (Currently I execute a byte seek to
> > > > the current position to achieve this flushing.)
> > > 
> > > And this horribly broken, unreliable, crappy hack is supposed to be a better "solution"?
> > > The absolute minimum for me to consider that acceptable would be a working, tested, official resync function (we really don't have that yet for demuxers?).
> > 
> > What are you talking about? My MPlayer fork uses libavformat with
> > libbluray just fine, while MPlayer doesn't and _can't_.
> 
> Actually I think MPlayer works mostly fine with it now, and admittedly
> without this patch.
> Except for it missing that one hack for flushing. Am I missing something
> why you claim it can't?

You just implemented passing through the "stream PTS" stuff, so it
should probably be mostly fine now.

> 
> > The only "hack" about this is that libavformat doesn't provide a proper
> > flush function. It could be easily added.
> 
> Do you volunteer? :-)

Sure. I was already wondering how to implement it. One issue is with
which formats such an API makes sense at all, and whether there is a
need for a AVInputFormat.flush callback.

Currently, I'm thinking it would be fine if the implementation only
drops buffers, with no further sanity checks. (It would just break the
data stream when used with formats which don't/can't support it.) I'm
wondering whether the function should make efforts to flush the
AVIOContext too.

> > > >> Either way the read_seek is there, and until such time someone removes
> > > >> it I am not inclined to consider it a good idea to keep it broken!
> > > > 
> > > > It's not broken. If the fact that mpeg-ts doesn't use it means it's
> > > > broken, you're going to have to apply the same patch to a lot of
> > > > demuxers.
> > > > 
> > > > And again, I don't understand why you can't just redirect the seek in
> > > > demux_lavf.c. This would be an easy fix for the MPlayer problem.
> > > 
> > > Because I want FFmpeg to work well, not make both projects a crap heap by adding workarounds in one around issues in the other.
> > 
> > I just suggested a clean solution. If you don't want to listen, fine,
> > pursue your shitty hacks to keep an aging codebase working.
> 
> See, that's where our disagreement comes from: I considered your
> approach the "shitty hack" (well, not quite that much, but a bit).
> I'll not completely revise that until we have a proper flush function.
> :)
> I also still think it kind of would be nice if anyone could implement
> a protocol that can help with seeking just by providing a time seek function
> instead of hacking every single application to manually call a stream
> seek.

If the protocol is implemented as a demuxer, the user doesn't need to
do anything, and it "just works".

That's why I think implementing bluray and dvd support as demuxers in
libavformat would be promising. All the messy details of supporting
these media could be confined to the demuxer, including the need to
adjust the "display" timestamps to playback time.

Playback (including seeking) would work exactly as with any other
format. It would make transcoding easier too, because it could export
DVD subtitles in the same way mkv or mp4 do.

This would liberate all applications from needing lots of
intrusive special code just for BD/DVD playback.

The main problems here are:
- how to implement navigation (dvdnav, bdnav)
- switching titles

The latter is a problem because libavformat can't "unload" already
created AVStreams. Switching a title can completely change everything,
including the set of available streams and metadata like audio
and subtitle languages.

> But with the problems you mention and it being pointless for MPlayer on
> top it might be better to deal with it when someone has a use for it.
> So I'll retract the patch.
> Btw.: mmsh.c seems to have a read_seek, too.
> 
> Reimar
> 
> P.S.: I hope you forgive me for the flinging of terms like "crap" and
> "hack", I think I was too extreme there, even ignoring the parts
> where I was wrong.

And I apologize too for being a bit too aggressive.


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list