[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] checkasm: Use a self-balancing tree

Henrik Gramner henrik at gramner.com
Fri Sep 25 22:06:41 CEST 2015

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> is there any reason why this doesnt use
> libavutil/tree.* ?

Two reasons basically.

First, the glue code required to use a generic tree implementation
instead of one customized for this use case would be as large as the
implementation of the tree itself.

Second, my intention is to port it back to x264 at some point so I
don't want to rely too much on libavutil features unless there's a
large benefit of doing so.

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list