[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: only warn about hwaccel with frame threads

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 11:42:54AM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun
> <andreas.cadhalpun at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > VLC uses hwaccel with frame threads and it works fine, but returning
> > an error here made it fail.
> >
> > This regression was introduced in commit 31741ae.
> >
> 
> I'm still opposed to this, and so is everyone else that commented on the issue.
> Also, the vp9 hwaccel will most definitely misbehave with MT, so this
> one needs to be re-factored before MT is allowed at the very least.

vp9 has been fixed

from IRC:

<michaelni> BBB, can the vp9 & hwaccel-mt patches be applied or is there a reason to wait ?
<BBB> no reason to wait, can be applied
<BBB> sorry, I haven’t kept track very closely of that patch
<BBB> I can apply if you want, but it’s probably faster if you merge for me
<BBB> I believe with that patch, we can revert the previous patch that prevented mt+hwaccel, as andreas requested
<BBB> it will still not work for dxva2, but that’s unrelated to vp9 since it fails for h264 also
<michaelni> i can apply the patchs, i just dont want to step on anyones toes, the vp9 one seems clear but which is the 2nd one, the one from anreas that changes it to a warning or revert 31741ae ?

just want to make double sure i dont step on anyones toes, thus asking
on the ML here too before applying the patch

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

It is what and why we do it that matters, not just one of them.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20160213/b5ba2b32/attachment.sig>