[FFmpeg-devel] 2.9/3.0, 2.8.5, ...

Rostislav Pehlivanov atomnuker at gmail.com
Fri Jan 1 16:37:30 CET 2016


I think a 3.0 release needs more major things, so a 2.9 would make more
sense IMO.

On 1 January 2016 at 14:28, Paul B Mahol <onemda at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 1/1/16, Michael Niedermayer <michael at niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > Its a while since 2.8 so unless there are objections i will make a
> > 2.9 or if people prefer a 3.0 within the next month or so
> >
> > Also ill likely make another round of point releases from the
> > 2.8/2.7/2.6/2.5 branches soon, that is if someone wants to backport
> > something or fix and backport ...
>
> There were major bump, so 3.0 makes more sense....
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list