[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lswr: remove support for libsoxr resampling
Michael Niedermayer
michael at niedermayer.cc
Mon Mar 6 14:55:22 EET 2017
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:19:48AM +0000, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> The soxr resampler is slower and worse than the swr resampler,
> hence drop the former.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnuker at gmail.com>
> ---
> Changelog | 1 +
> MAINTAINERS | 1 -
> configure | 5 +-
> doc/resampler.texi | 53 ++++-----------
> libswresample/Makefile | 1 -
> libswresample/options.c | 7 --
> libswresample/resample.c | 2 +-
> libswresample/soxr_resample.c | 130 ------------------------------------
> libswresample/swresample.c | 18 +----
> libswresample/swresample.h | 7 --
> libswresample/swresample_internal.h | 9 +--
> 11 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 213 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 libswresample/soxr_resample.c
the way soxr resamples is different from how swr implements it, that
could result in different advantages and disadvantages.
I would expect "which is better" to depend on what is meassured
i also think this should be CC-ed to rob, thus adding him to CC
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety -- Benjamin Franklin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20170306/b0659eef/attachment.sig>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list