[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] avcodec/h264_direct: Fix runtime error: signed integer overflow: 2147483647 - -14133 cannot be represented in type 'int'
wm4
nfxjfg at googlemail.com
Fri Mar 10 17:01:36 EET 2017
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:24:52 +0100
Michael Niedermayer <michael at niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> Fixes: 755/clusterfuzz-testcase-5369072516595712
>
> See: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] avcodec/h264_direct: Fix runtime error: signed integer overflow: 2147483647 - -14133 cannot be represented in type 'int'
>
> Found-by: continuous fuzzing process https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/tree/master/targets/ffmpeg
> Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael at niedermayer.cc>
> ---
> libavcodec/h264_direct.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavcodec/h264_direct.c b/libavcodec/h264_direct.c
> index cbb84665b3..66e54479d1 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/h264_direct.c
> +++ b/libavcodec/h264_direct.c
> @@ -39,7 +39,12 @@ static int get_scale_factor(H264SliceContext *sl,
> int poc, int poc1, int i)
> {
> int poc0 = sl->ref_list[0][i].poc;
> - int td = av_clip_int8(poc1 - poc0);
> + int64_t pocdiff = poc1 - (int64_t)poc0;
> + int td = av_clip_int8(pocdiff);
> +
> + if (pocdiff != (int)pocdiff)
> + avpriv_request_sample(sl->h264->avctx, "pocdiff overflow\n");
> +
> if (td == 0 || sl->ref_list[0][i].parent->long_ref) {
> return 256;
> } else {
Hard to image that these poc values aren't bounded by something else,
but I don't know.
Also the previous patch didn't have this request_sample call, which
inflates this whole thing by 5 lines of code.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list