[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] avcodec/snowdec: Check intra block dc differences.
michael at niedermayer.cc
Thu Nov 16 23:41:08 EET 2017
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 01:21:19PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Michael Niedermayer <
> michael at niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 06:26:06AM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffmpeg at gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > 2017-11-16 4:06 GMT+01:00 Ronald S. Bultje <rsbultje at gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > So, commit it without the error message? I really don't see the
> > issue.
> > > >
> > > > As explained, the issue is that without an error message, it
> > > > is impossible to parse any related bug report.
> > >
> > >
> > > We've been OK with that situation so far. Since it only happens for
> > fuzzed
> > > files, it's OK to continue going like that.
> > Thats not the case, the snow spec contains no limit in the place where
> > we need to check. Its a natural and expected limit so likely all files
> > will be within that but a file outside would still be arguably valid.
> > So a valid file could potentially be outside this range and the
> > maintainer (that being me) need to know about this.
> > Please dont see every change that originated from a fuzzer generated
> > report as only related to fuzzed files.
> We are re-hashing old arguments here. I'm not really interested in that.
> My review comment is and remains: please remove the log msg. Otherwise, the
> patch is perfectly fine.
Thank you for your review comment.
please awnser my question, if this is just a suggestion or a
veto, so we can move forward. Its not clear from your wording to me
if you belive you have authority over other maintainers or not.
Normally developers withdraw a comment if the maintainer disagrees
or one would start some poll to find out what the majority preferres
and create a rule from that for all (which i suggested already)
yet you just repeat the same comment.
It feels impolite if i would just go ahead and push the patch without
confirming that this is just a suggestion and not some kind of veto.
So please clarify this
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
What does censorship reveal? It reveals fear. -- Julian Assange
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ffmpeg-devel