[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 4/4] lavd: Add KMS frame grabber

[James Almer]

On 9/4/2017 2:46 PM, wm4 wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 19:40:25 +0200
> Michael Niedermayer <michael at niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> 
>> My thought, if its less energy intensive than what we have then its
>> worth having.
>> A tiny contribution to reducing carbon emissions ...
> 
> Removing some fringe codecs/filters and FATE test would contribute a
> LOT to this. Currently, Libav is way more ecofriendly than FFmpeg,
> because it builds and runs FATE in much shorter time

It's the opposite. Both ffmpeg and libav should have more complete FATE
suites. Code and function coverage is below 60%.