[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] libavformat: add mbedTLS based TLS

Thomas Volkert silvo at gmx.net
Tue Apr 24 09:08:56 EEST 2018

On 23.04.2018 21:02, James Almer wrote:
> On 4/23/2018 6:27 AM, Thomas Volkert wrote:
>> On 22.04.2018 20:03, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>> 2018-04-22 20:00 GMT+02:00, Nicolas George <george at nsup.org>:
>>>> Carl Eugen Hoyos (2018-04-22):
>>>>> How do you detect that this is not the "current version" of mbed?
>>>> Is it really our responsibility?
>>> We try to always do it and I believe that allowing LGPL makes
>>> more sense and less headache: Since we do the checks so
>>> rigorously it makes sense to assume we did it as correctly
>>> for this case.
>>> I don't understand why we don't go the easy way that clearly
>>> has advantages instead for the complicated way (with at
>>> least some disadvantages).
>> Okay. I looked over their web page and the Debian packages again.
>> The web page of mbedTLS declares Apache license as the "primary open
>> source license".
>> I will add it to EXTERNAL_LIBRARY_VERSION3_LIST and push it today, if
>> their are no further objections.
> Not only there was an objection/request by Rostislav Pehlivanov you
> ignored, 
I haven't ignored him, I answered him.
My mails were delayed by some minutes.

> you also pushed this after ONE day in the ml, 

I posted the patch 3 times on the mailing list, it was for 2 days on the

> with absolutely
> no review. 
There were already answers which contained reasonable feedback (in my
Please, make a a review in the way you like and send it to the list.

> What exactly was the hurry?
> Please, revert this. Forcing your way through is not how code should be
> committed.
That was not the intention.
Let's focus on the content.

Best regards,

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list