[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH][ticket #5522] lavc/cfhd: interlaced frame decoding added

Paul B Mahol onemda at gmail.com
Wed May 23 18:20:07 EEST 2018


On 5/23/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffmpeg at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2018-05-23 0:21 GMT+02:00, Hendrik Leppkes <h.leppkes at gmail.com>:
>> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:35 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffmpeg at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 2018-05-22 17:40 GMT+02:00, Gagandeep Singh <deepgagan231197 at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> +            low    = s->plane[plane].subband[0];
>>>> +            high   = s->plane[plane].subband[8];
>>>> +            output = s->plane[plane].l_h[6];
>>>> +            for (i = 0; i < lowpass_width; i++) {
>>>> +                vert_filter(output, lowpass_width, low, lowpass_width,
>>>> high, highpass_stride, lowpass_height);
>>>> +                low++;
>>>> +                high++;
>>>> +                output++;
>>>> +            }
>>>>
>>>> -        low    = s->plane[plane].subband[0];
>>>> -        high   = s->plane[plane].subband[8];
>>>> -        output = s->plane[plane].l_h[6];
>>>> -        for (i = 0; i < lowpass_width; i++) {
>>>> -            vert_filter(output, lowpass_width, low, lowpass_width,
>>>> high,
>>>> highpass_stride, lowpass_height);
>>>> -            low++;
>>>> -            high++;
>>>> -            output++;
>>>> -        }
>>>
>>> The patch will get much more readable (and easier to review)
>>> if you do not re-indent, instead send a second patch with the
>>> cosmetic changes only.
>>>
>>
>> Except, no sane developer works like that.
>
> It's great to know that you are so much smarter than most developers,
> I will forward the next regression directly to you to fix it.

CoC violation. First warning given.


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list