[FFmpeg-devel] [DECISION] Include more developers in the voting committee [#4]
Ronald S. Bultje
rsbultje at gmail.com
Mon Apr 8 22:40:20 EEST 2019
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 12:42 PM Balint Marton <cus at passwd.hu> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Here is a call for the people in the voting committee [1] on the decision
> of extending it.
>
> Using the same guidelines as in the second extension [2], the following
> candidates were found:
>
> git log libav/master..master --no-merges --since=2018-03-30T00:00:00Z
> --until 2019-03-30T00:00:00Z --pretty=fuller | grep '^Commit:' | sed
> 's/<.*//' |sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
>
> 662 Commit: Michael Niedermayer
> 528 Commit: Paul B Mahol
> 227 Commit: James Almer
> 194 Commit: Carl Eugen Hoyos
> 183 Commit: Mark Thompson
> 141 Commit: Marton Balint
> 99 Commit: Jun Zhao
> 84 Commit: Steven Liu
> 73 Commit: Martin Vignali
> 64 Commit: Gyan Doshi
> 55 Commit: Aman Gupta
> 42 Commit: Timo Rothenpieler
> 35 Commit: Zhong Li
> 31 Commit: Karthick Jeyapal
> 31 Commit: Karthick J
> 23 Commit: Rostislav Pehlivanov
> 22 Commit: Peter Ross
> 22 Commit: Clément Bœsch
> 21 Commit: Lou Logan
> 21 Commit: Jan Ekström
>
> Some of these developers are already in the voting committee, the new ones
> would be:
>
> Aman Gupta
> Gyan Doshi
> Jan Ekström
> Jun Zhao
> Karthick Jeyapal
> Mark Thompson
> Martin Vignali
> Peter Ross
> Steven Liu
> Timo Rothenpieler
> Zhong Li
>
> Question: Do you support extending the voting committte with the people
> above
Yes.
(Didn't we use to do anonymous voting? I personally have no issue with this
approach, but I can imagine that someone who wanted to vote against a
particular person might prefer to do so privately... This is obviously more
important for the actual vote, not the extension of the voting roll...)
Ronald
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list