[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 3/5] tools/target_dec_fuzzer: Adjust VP7 threshold
Michael Niedermayer
michael at niedermayer.cc
Sun Sep 29 18:45:13 EEST 2019
On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 03:34:33PM +1000, Peter Ross wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 01:53:43AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Fixes: Timeout (110sec -> 10sec)
> > Fixes: 17705/clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-ffmpeg_AV_CODEC_ID_VP7_fuzzer-5765834135306240
> >
> > Found-by: continuous fuzzing process https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/tree/master/projects/ffmpeg
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael at niedermayer.cc>
> > ---
> > tools/target_dec_fuzzer.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/target_dec_fuzzer.c b/tools/target_dec_fuzzer.c
> > index 4af7b26e54..a2c59be318 100644
> > --- a/tools/target_dec_fuzzer.c
> > +++ b/tools/target_dec_fuzzer.c
> > @@ -153,6 +153,7 @@ int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) {
> > case AV_CODEC_ID_MSS2: maxpixels /= 16384; break;
> > case AV_CODEC_ID_SNOW: maxpixels /= 128; break;
> > case AV_CODEC_ID_TRUEMOTION2: maxpixels /= 1024; break;
> > + case AV_CODEC_ID_VP7: maxpixels /= 256; break;
> > }
>
> ok. however i am curious why this is needed for vp7 and not vp8.
The CPU time was spend in vp7_fade_frame() i dont see a similar
call for vp8 but maybe the fuzzer will find something in vp8
too eventually
will apply
thx
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Why not whip the teacher when the pupil misbehaves? -- Diogenes of Sinope
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20190929/efb8772a/attachment.sig>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list