[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 5/6] avformat/mux: Don't modify packets we don't own
Marton Balint
cus at passwd.hu
Thu Apr 16 23:34:10 EEST 2020
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> The documentation of av_write_frame() explicitly states that the function
> doesn't take ownership of the packets sent to it; while av_write_frame()
> does not directly unreference the packets after having written them, it
> nevertheless modifies the packet in various ways:
> 1. The timestamps might be modified either by prepare_input_packet() or
> compute_muxer_pkt_fields().
> 2. If a bitstream filter gets applied, it takes ownership of the
> reference and the side-data in the packet sent to it.
> In case of do_packet_auto_bsf(), the end result is that the returned packet
> contains the output of the last bsf in the chain. If an error happens,
> a blank packet will be returned; a packet may also simply not lead to
> any output (vp9_superframe).
> This also implies that side data needs to be really copied and can't be
> shared with the input packet.
> The method choosen here minimizes copying of data: When the input isn't
> refcounted and no bitstream filter is applied, the packet's data will
> not be copied.
>
> Notice that packets that contain uncoded frames are exempt from this
> because these packets are not owned by and returned to the user. This
> also moves unreferencing the packets containing uncoded frames to
> av_write_frame() in the noninterleaved codepath; in the interleaved
> codepath, these packets are already freed in av_interleaved_write_frame(),
> so that unreferencing the packets in write_uncoded_frame_internal() is
> no longer needed. It has been removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt at gmail.com>
> ---
> I was actually surprised when I realized how freeing uncoded frames in
> the noninterleaved codepath could be left to av_write_frame().
>
> libavformat/mux.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavformat/mux.c b/libavformat/mux.c
> index cae9f42d11..48c0d4cd5f 100644
> --- a/libavformat/mux.c
> +++ b/libavformat/mux.c
> @@ -874,11 +874,12 @@ static int do_packet_auto_bsf(AVFormatContext *s, AVPacket *pkt) {
> return 1;
> }
>
> -int av_write_frame(AVFormatContext *s, AVPacket *pkt)
> +int av_write_frame(AVFormatContext *s, AVPacket *in)
> {
> + AVPacket local_pkt, *pkt = &local_pkt;
> int ret;
>
> - if (!pkt) {
> + if (!in) {
> if (s->oformat->flags & AVFMT_ALLOW_FLUSH) {
> ret = s->oformat->write_packet(s, NULL);
> flush_if_needed(s);
> @@ -889,22 +890,49 @@ int av_write_frame(AVFormatContext *s, AVPacket *pkt)
> return 1;
> }
>
> + if (in->flags & AV_PKT_FLAG_UNCODED_FRAME) {
> + pkt = in;
> + } else {
> + /* We don't own in, so we have to make sure not to modify it.
> + * The following avoids copying in's data unnecessarily.
> + * Copying side data is unavoidable as a bitstream filter
> + * may change it, e.g. free it on errors. */
> + pkt->buf = NULL;
> + pkt->data = in->data;
> + pkt->size = in->size;
> + ret = av_packet_copy_props(pkt, in);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + if (in->buf) {
> + pkt->buf = av_buffer_ref(in->buf);
> + if (!pkt->buf) {
> + ret = AVERROR(ENOMEM);
> + goto fail;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> ret = prepare_input_packet(s, pkt);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto fail;
>
> ret = do_packet_auto_bsf(s, pkt);
> if (ret <= 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto fail;
>
> #if FF_API_COMPUTE_PKT_FIELDS2 && FF_API_LAVF_AVCTX
> ret = compute_muxer_pkt_fields(s, s->streams[pkt->stream_index], pkt);
>
> if (ret < 0 && !(s->oformat->flags & AVFMT_NOTIMESTAMPS))
> - return ret;
> + goto fail;
> #endif
>
> - return write_packet(s, pkt);
> + ret = write_packet(s, pkt);
> +
> +fail:
> + // Uncoded frames using the noninterleaved codepath are freed here
This comment does not seem accurate. Pkt must always be unrefed here, not
only for the uncoded_frames (where it happens to be == in), or I miss
something? If not, then I'd just simply remove this comment.
Otherwise looks good. I checked the other patches in the series they all
look good as well.
Thanks,
Marton
> + av_packet_unref(pkt);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> #define CHUNK_START 0x1000
> @@ -1319,7 +1347,6 @@ static int write_uncoded_frame_internal(AVFormatContext *s, int stream_index,
> AVFrame *frame, int interleaved)
> {
> AVPacket pkt, *pktp;
> - int ret;
>
> av_assert0(s->oformat);
> if (!s->oformat->write_uncoded_frame) {
> @@ -1349,11 +1376,8 @@ static int write_uncoded_frame_internal(AVFormatContext *s, int stream_index,
> pkt.flags |= AV_PKT_FLAG_UNCODED_FRAME;
> }
>
> - ret = interleaved ? av_interleaved_write_frame(s, pktp) :
> - av_write_frame(s, pktp);
> - if (pktp)
> - av_packet_unref(pktp);
> - return ret;
> + return interleaved ? av_interleaved_write_frame(s, pktp) :
> + av_write_frame(s, pktp);
> }
>
> int av_write_uncoded_frame(AVFormatContext *s, int stream_index,
> --
> 2.20.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list