[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 3/3] avcodech/h264_picture: use ff_thread_replace_frame()
James Almer
jamrial at gmail.com
Wed Aug 11 01:22:02 EEST 2021
On 8/10/2021 7:16 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> James Almer:
>> Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial at gmail.com>
>> ---
>> libavcodec/h264_picture.c | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/libavcodec/h264_picture.c b/libavcodec/h264_picture.c
>> index ff30166b4d..109a8ff31d 100644
>> --- a/libavcodec/h264_picture.c
>> +++ b/libavcodec/h264_picture.c
>> @@ -154,8 +154,7 @@ int ff_h264_replace_picture(H264Context *h, H264Picture *dst, const H264Picture
>> av_assert0(src->tf.f == src->f);
>>
>> dst->tf.f = dst->f;
>> - ff_thread_release_buffer(h->avctx, &dst->tf);
>> - ret = ff_thread_ref_frame(&dst->tf, &src->tf);
>> + ret = ff_thread_replace_frame(h->avctx, &dst->tf, &src->tf);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> goto fail;
>>
>>
> Is there a reason that you only intend to use this here? Couldn't one
> replace all occurrences of ff_thread_ref_frame() with this (and remove
> ff_thread_ref_frame())?
I didn't look into it. Also, it would probably only make sense to
replace the relevant calls in update_thread_context() implementations,
since every other use of av_frame_ref() and ff_thread_ref_frame() will
be for non matching frames where it makes no difference.
>
> - Andreas
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list