[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] vaapi: support VAProfileH264High10
Xiang, Haihao
haihao.xiang at intel.com
Thu Jan 5 08:07:39 EET 2023
On Di, 2022-12-27 at 11:12 +0800, Jianfeng Zheng wrote:
> see https://github.com/intel/libva/pull/664
>
> Signed-off-by: jianfeng.zheng <jianfeng.zheng at mthreads.com>
> ---
> configure | 13 +++++++++++++
> libavcodec/h264_slice.c | 6 ++++++
> libavcodec/vaapi_decode.c | 10 ++++++++++
> libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> libavcodec/vaapi_h264.c | 5 +++--
> 5 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/configure b/configure
> index f08cdab3d1..ac199d97cb 100755
> --- a/configure
> +++ b/configure
> @@ -2410,6 +2410,7 @@ HAVE_LIST="
> texi2html
> xmllint
> zlib_gzip
> + va_profile_h264_high10
> "
>
> # options emitted with CONFIG_ prefix but not available on the command line
> @@ -6958,6 +6959,18 @@ if enabled vaapi; then
> check_type "va/va.h va/va_enc_jpeg.h" "VAEncPictureParameterBufferJPEG"
> check_type "va/va.h va/va_enc_vp8.h" "VAEncPictureParameterBufferVP8"
> check_type "va/va.h va/va_enc_vp9.h" "VAEncPictureParameterBufferVP9"
> +
> + #
> + # Using 'VA_CHECK_VERSION' in source codes make things easy. But
> we have to wait
> + # until newly added VAProfile being distributed by VAAPI released
> version.
> + #
> + # Before or after that, we can use auto-detection to keep version
> compatibility.
> + # It always works.
> + #
> + disable va_profile_h264_high10 && enabled h264_vaapi_hwaccel
> + test_code cc va/va.h "VAProfile p = VAProfileH264High10" &&
> + enable va_profile_h264_high10
> +
I think we should wait for a new VA-API version, otherwise it is meaningless to
merge this patch without vaapi support.
> fi
>
> if enabled_all opencl libdrm ; then
> diff --git a/libavcodec/h264_slice.c b/libavcodec/h264_slice.c
> index 420758ba0a..b9236281b1 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/h264_slice.c
> +++ b/libavcodec/h264_slice.c
> @@ -806,6 +806,12 @@ static enum AVPixelFormat
> get_pixel_format(H264Context *h, int force_callback)
> } else if (CHROMA422(h))
> *fmt++ = AV_PIX_FMT_YUV422P10;
> else
> +#if CONFIG_H264_VAAPI_HWACCEL
> + // Just add as candidate. Whether VAProfileH264High10 usable or
> + // not is decided by vaapi_decode_make_config() defined in FFmpeg
> + // and vaQueryCodingProfile() defined in libva.
> + *fmt++ = AV_PIX_FMT_VAAPI;
> +#endif
> *fmt++ = AV_PIX_FMT_YUV420P10;
After applying this change, AV_PIX_FMT_YUV420P10 is always added as candidate
for all 10bit videos when CONFIG_H264_VAAPI_HWACCEL is 1.
It should be:
else {
#if CONFIG_H264_VAAPI_HWACCEL
*fmt++ = AV_PIX_FMT_VAAPI;
#endif
*fmt++ = AV_PIX_FMT_YUV420P10;
}
> break;
> case 12:
> diff --git a/libavcodec/vaapi_decode.c b/libavcodec/vaapi_decode.c
> index 134f10eca5..551c7593b9 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/vaapi_decode.c
> +++ b/libavcodec/vaapi_decode.c
> @@ -402,6 +402,9 @@ static const struct {
> H264ConstrainedBaseline),
> MAP(H264, H264_MAIN, H264Main ),
> MAP(H264, H264_HIGH, H264High ),
> +#if HAVE_VA_PROFILE_H264_HIGH10
> + MAP(H264, H264_HIGH_10, H264High10 ),
> +#endif
> #if VA_CHECK_VERSION(0, 37, 0)
> MAP(HEVC, HEVC_MAIN, HEVCMain ),
> MAP(HEVC, HEVC_MAIN_10, HEVCMain10 ),
> @@ -510,6 +513,13 @@ static int vaapi_decode_make_config(AVCodecContext
> *avctx,
> if (exact_match)
> break;
> }
> +#if HAVE_VA_PROFILE_H264_HIGH10
> + //incase 8bit stream being decoded under VAProfileH264High10
> + if (avctx->codec_id == AV_CODEC_ID_H264 &&
> + (avctx->profile == FF_PROFILE_H264_EXTENDED ||
> avctx->profile == FF_PROFILE_H264_BASELINE) &&
> + matched_va_profile == VAProfileH264High)
> + break;
> +#endif
How about to take bit depth into account when finding out the matched va profile
?
> }
> av_freep(&profile_list);
>
> diff --git a/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c b/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c
> index dd17be2190..0d2b4631b8 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c
> +++ b/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>
> #include "libavutil/avassert.h"
> #include "libavutil/common.h"
> +#include "libavutil/pixdesc.h"
> #include "libavutil/internal.h"
> #include "libavutil/opt.h"
>
> @@ -290,10 +291,21 @@ static int
> vaapi_encode_h264_init_sequence_params(AVCodecContext *avctx)
> H264RawPPS *pps = &priv->raw_pps;
> VAEncSequenceParameterBufferH264 *vseq = ctx->codec_sequence_params;
> VAEncPictureParameterBufferH264 *vpic = ctx->codec_picture_params;
> + const AVPixFmtDescriptor *desc;
> + int bit_depth;
>
> memset(sps, 0, sizeof(*sps));
> memset(pps, 0, sizeof(*pps));
>
> + desc = av_pix_fmt_desc_get(priv->common.input_frames->sw_format);
> + av_assert0(desc);
> + if (desc->nb_components == 1 || desc->log2_chroma_w != 1 ||
> desc->log2_chroma_h != 1) {
> + av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, "Chroma format of input pixel format "
> + "%s is not supported.\n", desc->name);
> + return AVERROR(EINVAL);
> + }
Is it possible a new vaapi driver would support new formats? e.g. vuyx for high
profile 4:4:4 ?
> + bit_depth = desc->comp[0].depth;
> +
> sps->nal_unit_header.nal_ref_idc = 3;
> sps->nal_unit_header.nal_unit_type = H264_NAL_SPS;
>
> @@ -303,11 +315,11 @@ static int
> vaapi_encode_h264_init_sequence_params(AVCodecContext *avctx)
> avctx->profile == FF_PROFILE_H264_MAIN)
> sps->constraint_set1_flag = 1;
>
> - if (avctx->profile == FF_PROFILE_H264_HIGH)
> + if (avctx->profile == FF_PROFILE_H264_HIGH || avctx->profile ==
> FF_PROFILE_H264_HIGH_10)
> sps->constraint_set3_flag = ctx->gop_size == 1;
>
> if (avctx->profile == FF_PROFILE_H264_MAIN ||
> - avctx->profile == FF_PROFILE_H264_HIGH) {
> + avctx->profile == FF_PROFILE_H264_HIGH || avctx->profile ==
> FF_PROFILE_H264_HIGH_10) {
> sps->constraint_set4_flag = 1;
> sps->constraint_set5_flag = ctx->b_per_p == 0;
> }
> @@ -348,6 +360,8 @@ static int
> vaapi_encode_h264_init_sequence_params(AVCodecContext *avctx)
>
> sps->seq_parameter_set_id = 0;
> sps->chroma_format_idc = 1;
> + sps->bit_depth_luma_minus8 = bit_depth - 8;
> + sps->bit_depth_chroma_minus8 = bit_depth - 8;
>
> sps->log2_max_frame_num_minus4 = 4;
> sps->pic_order_cnt_type = 0;
> @@ -1111,6 +1125,9 @@ static av_cold int
> vaapi_encode_h264_configure(AVCodecContext *avctx)
> }
>
> static const VAAPIEncodeProfile vaapi_encode_h264_profiles[] = {
> +#if HAVE_VA_PROFILE_H264_HIGH10
> + { FF_PROFILE_H264_HIGH_10, 10, 3, 1, 1, VAProfileH264High10 },
> +#endif
> { FF_PROFILE_H264_HIGH, 8, 3, 1, 1, VAProfileH264High },
> { FF_PROFILE_H264_MAIN, 8, 3, 1, 1, VAProfileH264Main },
> { FF_PROFILE_H264_CONSTRAINED_BASELINE,
> @@ -1175,11 +1192,13 @@ static av_cold int
> vaapi_encode_h264_init(AVCodecContext *avctx)
> av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, "H.264 extended profile "
> "is not supported.\n");
> return AVERROR_PATCHWELCOME;
> +#if !HAVE_VA_PROFILE_H264_HIGH10
> case FF_PROFILE_H264_HIGH_10:
> case FF_PROFILE_H264_HIGH_10_INTRA:
Is FF_PROFILE_H264_HIGH_10_INTRA supported when HAVE_VA_PROFILE_H264_HIGH10 is 1
? FF_PROFILE_H264_HIGH_10_INTRA is not added into vaapi_encode_h264_profiles[].
BTW fate server failed to apply your patch, please check your patch format. See
https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/patch/CAFWZL8qpn_+ehMrexRg+J8TQqjKZxBES7SKMwQjfW0vS3vHWMg@mail.gmail.com/
Thanks
Haihao
> av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, "H.264 10-bit profiles "
> "are not supported.\n");
> return AVERROR_PATCHWELCOME;
> +#endif
> case FF_PROFILE_H264_HIGH_422:
> case FF_PROFILE_H264_HIGH_422_INTRA:
> case FF_PROFILE_H264_HIGH_444:
> @@ -1267,6 +1286,7 @@ static const AVOption vaapi_encode_h264_options[] = {
> { PROFILE("constrained_baseline", FF_PROFILE_H264_CONSTRAINED_BASELINE)
> },
> { PROFILE("main", FF_PROFILE_H264_MAIN) },
> { PROFILE("high", FF_PROFILE_H264_HIGH) },
> + { PROFILE("high10", FF_PROFILE_H264_HIGH_10) },
> #undef PROFILE
>
> { "level", "Set level (level_idc)",
> diff --git a/libavcodec/vaapi_h264.c b/libavcodec/vaapi_h264.c
> index 9332aa6f31..3e44c8caf6 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/vaapi_h264.c
> +++ b/libavcodec/vaapi_h264.c
> @@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ static int vaapi_h264_start_frame(AVCodecContext
> *avctx,
> VAPictureParameterBufferH264 pic_param;
> VAIQMatrixBufferH264 iq_matrix;
> int err;
> + int qp_bd_offset = 6 * (sps->bit_depth_luma - 8);
>
> pic->output_surface = ff_vaapi_get_surface_id(h->cur_pic_ptr->f);
>
> @@ -256,8 +257,8 @@ static int vaapi_h264_start_frame(AVCodecContext
> *avctx,
> .log2_max_pic_order_cnt_lsb_minus4 =
> sps->log2_max_poc_lsb - 4,
> .delta_pic_order_always_zero_flag =
> sps->delta_pic_order_always_zero_flag,
> },
> - .pic_init_qp_minus26 = pps->init_qp - 26,
> - .pic_init_qs_minus26 = pps->init_qs - 26,
> + .pic_init_qp_minus26 = pps->init_qp -
> 26 - qp_bd_offset,
> + .pic_init_qs_minus26 = pps->init_qs -
> 26 - qp_bd_offset,
> .chroma_qp_index_offset =
> pps->chroma_qp_index_offset[0],
> .second_chroma_qp_index_offset =
> pps->chroma_qp_index_offset[1],
> .pic_fields.bits = {
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list