[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] lavc/libx264: add mb_info option
Carotti, Elias
eliascrt at amazon.it
Tue Jul 11 13:46:20 EEST 2023
> From 5bdb624d8dbcff96493a63f02f68a3961cf72723 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Elias Carotti <eliascrt at amazon.it>
> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 19:29:08 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] lavc/libx264: add mb_info option
>
> Pass the information about unchanged parts of the frame by means of
> the AVVideoHint side data.
> ---
> Changelog | 1 +
> doc/APIchanges | 3 ++
> libavcodec/libx264.c | 94
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> libavcodec/version.h | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Changelog b/Changelog
> index 3876082844..70b0fe94a3 100644
> --- a/Changelog
> +++ b/Changelog
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ version <next>:
> - Raw VVC bitstream parser, muxer and demuxer
> - Bitstream filter for editing metadata in VVC streams
> - Bitstream filter for converting VVC from MP4 to Annex B
> +- support for the P_SKIP hinting to speed up libx264 encoding
>
> version 6.0:
> - Radiance HDR image support
> diff --git a/doc/APIchanges b/doc/APIchanges index
> bfe04556d2..89ff88af15 100644
> --- a/doc/APIchanges
> +++ b/doc/APIchanges
> @@ -2,6 +2,9 @@ The last version increases of all libraries were on
> 2023-02-09
>
> API changes, most recent first:
>
> +2023-06-21 - xxxxxxxxxx - lavc 60.23.100 - libx264.c
> + Add mb_info option.
> Do we actually need the option? If the encoder's caller bothered with adding the side data, then I'd think it should always be used, otherwise why is it even there?
I agree, I just thought I had to update that file as well, if that's not the case feel free to remove it.
Best
Elias
NICE SRL, viale Monte Grappa 3/5, 20124 Milano, Italia, Registro delle Imprese di Milano Monza Brianza Lodi REA n. 2096882, Capitale Sociale: 10.329,14 EUR i.v., Cod. Fisc. e P.IVA 01133050052, Societa con Socio Unico
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list